Yes, the 1,2 L is slightly finer optically but it is very heavy, very expensive and I don´t like it mechanically- the front part with the hood rotates and the hood is actually very large - so much so that it´s quite problematic to accomodate in my bag. In my opinion it is the best mechanically and optically close to the L lens (better then the 1,8). I used to have the Canon 1,2L II for a long time, then the 1,8 and now I have the Sigma which I find the best of them all. ![]() Sharp, contrasty, bang for buck, well made, fast AF The new "EX" is very different from the previous, and the feeling touching the lens is far better than before (the body is metallic, no plastic).īut I fear the propension to get scratched quite fast.īut it's really the only weakness I see, and I don't see any limit using this lens with a FF camera. ![]() I'm only disappointed for the color fringing that appears with the D7000.Įvery spot light prouces red fringing, and it's a bit frustrating. The AF is not the faster in the market, but is very precise, and it works well. I've never seen any flare, even shooting under a stage with the spot lights in the frame. ![]() The out of focus has a little CA in background (the foreground is virtualy perfect), but it's not disturbing. The bokeh is very similar to the Nikkor AFS, and even at f1.4 the definition is extremely high in the center, and far better than the Nikon AFD on the corners (the Nikon AFS is more linear). I've appreciated this lens together with the Nikon D700, and I think it's a very good choice to spare money (in comparison with the double costly Nikkor), keeping an high quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |